gregjohn wrote:
> I'm an electronic packrat.  One of the things I've collected is every povray SDL
> I've ever done, and I think it's incredibly cool that I still have their
> original creation dates associated with the file.
> 
> One day, for some reason,  some linux application was resetting the created date
> to the current date when I copied the files from one directory or media to
> another. I was ticked.  I immediately went to complain and ask how to opt-out
> of this behavior in the IRC channel for that app.  The one person there, to the
> best of my knowledge, fully understood what I was complaining about and implied
> I was silly for not wanting it to be that way.  He or she defended the idea
> that every time you copied a file, the only date that ever mattered would be
> the date-of-copy-to-new-folder.  Asinine!  And a radical change from how
> computing has always worked.  (FWIW, my linux system was only engaging in that
> behavior for a short time: it's not typical of how linux has worked for me.)
> 
> It does raise the question of whether some design questions are just silly.
> 
> Now on the other side of the spectrum, I know that in free software,
> non-RTFM'ming newbies can be rude.  It's like some beneficient old man puts out
> a giant sub sandwich for free at the pool, and nasty kids go up to complain that
> he didn't make separate mustard and non-mustard-containing sections.
> 
> On the other end, I think that sometimes there's a paradoxical view in free
> software of "We're ready for enterprise use," "We're the coolest,"  versus "Who
> cares if some a lazy newbie doesn't get it?", "Who cares if this locks out a
> work practice used by 25% of our users-- my work practice is better!"
> 
> 
I want to keep the originals dates also e.g. for my old pictures without 
exif section. I resorted to build a spreadsheet with all the dates of 
the pictures to be able to sort them appropriately.

Post a reply to this message