"Darren New" <dne### [at] sanrrcom> wrote in message
news:4766e906@news.povray.org...
> Gail Shaw wrote:
> > In theory, you want to prevent any form of data anomaly from multiple
> > accesses.
>
> Or, in my examples, you only have one writer, and that writer is doing
> atomic writes, and no reader looks at multiple records in one
> transaction. So what's there to transactionify?

Similar to what I have. My main system, most of the data changes are done
during the overnight processes. Hence, doing most of the reads uncommited is
safe. I don't need to go for read committed. I certainly don't need
serialisable.

Post a reply to this message