> "Rob M" <rob### [at] mcgregorfineartcom> wrote:
> This looks really good so far!

Impressive, I agree!

> (as an aside, true motion blur would not leave a single static oject amongst
> the motion blurred ones unless a flash or someting is used to highlight a
> particular instant

I do not fully agree. The angle that the object make compared to the eye
and the light source vary through the rotation, and there might be
singularity points. An obvious example would be a rotating mirror in a
dark area with a small lighted scene nearby. The rotating mirror would
show up as some blurred grayish form, but for the angle it exactly
project the lighted scene reflect to the camera eye. So the result would
be some blurred grayish form plus a very sharp image of the scene.

For a propeller, you'll see easily see that in real life under any
average sun light.

	Yannick

Post a reply to this message