Patrick Elliott wrote:
> "Well, ok, you could evolve something that 'acted' like a watch, but I 
> meant an actual watch!".

Plus, nobody really argues that watches don't evolve. What people argue 
is that the jump from "it's as complicated as a watch, and watches don't 
evolve naturally, hence it couldn't evolve naturally" isn't a valid jump 
of logic. Watches don't evolve not because they're complicated, but 
because they're not alive.

-- 
   Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
     It's not feature creep if you put it
     at the end and adjust the release date.

Post a reply to this message