Invisible wrote:
> Darren New wrote:
>> Invisible wrote:
>>> MySQL isn't transactional = I'm not really interested.
>>
>> It is if you use InnoDB engine tables. Note, it's about five times 
>> slower, but it's transactional.
> 
> Last I heard, it's transactional yet still not 100% ACID-compliant.

Well, no, but it's transactional. The A and I and D parts, I think.  I'm 
not sure whether it has support for the C part, since it insists on 
having defaults for every data type, so things like declaring a column 
"not null" and not providing a value isn't an error.

-- 
   Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
     It's not feature creep if you put it
     at the end and adjust the release date.

Post a reply to this message