stbenge wrote:

> You're first suggestion makes more sense, to add one function to another 
> inside a function block. I will give that a try. Thanks :)

You're welcome. Maybe I don't understand something here ;)

By additively combining pigments, don't you mean that if
one pigment A evaluates to <r1,g1,b1> at some point and
pigment B evaluates to <r2,g2,b2> at that point that
A+B should simply evaluate to <r1+r2,g1+g2,b1+b2>?

And wouldn't average {pigment_map {[A] [B]}} evaluate to 
<(r1+r2)/2,(g1+g2)/2,(b1+b2)/2> = 0.5*<r1+r2,g1+g2,b1+b2>,
so scaling it up by a factor of two should do the trick?

Post a reply to this message