scott wrote:
> You just need to think of a question that will exactly split the 
> remaining outcomes in half each time. 

I think as long as there's *something* down either branch, you're OK. I 
don't think it has to split things in half.

I did see one fun variant, where you start without having in mind 
anything in particular, and the asker tries to guess what it is, and the 
answerers each take a turn answering. The trick is that each answerer, 
after hearing the previous questions and answers, has to come up with 
something that matches the previous questions and answers.

-- 
   Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
     It's not feature creep if you put it
     at the end and adjust the release date.

Post a reply to this message