"Leef_me" <nomail@nomail> wrote in message 
news:web.4759b63117d569dd2a7b15450@news.povray.org...
> "pan" <pan### [at] syixcom> wrote:
>> "Leef_me" <nomail@nomail> wrote in message
>
>> >
>> > I understand that there are some fonts with separate files 
>> > like
>> > these.
>> > The particular font I wanted to use, doesn't happen to do it 
>> > this
>> > way.
>> >
>> > Leef_me
>> >
>> >
>> What's the font?
>> Some of us have collections of typefaces ...
>
> It has Curlz in the name, but it's a uSoft font packaged with 
> some uSoft
> products. Based on that thought, it's surely copyright and 
> trading is likely a
> no-no. I appreciate the thought, but Tim Attwood's code will 
> suffice or I'll
> make do with 'normal' or using a generated picture.
>
> Leef_me
>
>

Copyright isn't the point. Typefaces & fonts have been around a 
long time
and there are many, many instances of parallel/duplicate 
development.
So much so that an the identical appearance can (and does) have a
number of names. Some of us have been around long enough that by
sheer repetitiveness a font by one name can be visually recognized
as an analogue of another name.

That's o.k. though - it is tedious to inspect many to find one that 
has
the same kerning, form, etc. etc.

Post a reply to this message