On Thu, 06 Dec 2007 16:35:40 -0800, Tim Attwood wrote:

>>> Oh, it's just that Jesus did talk about the commandments and the law
>>> quite a bit.  It's legitimate to say that's clarification instead of
>>> historical context.
>>
>> Huh?  The 10 Commandments needed clarification?  I thought God was
>> supposed to be infallible?  Omnipotent, Omniscient, and all that?
>>
>> (Not trying to pick a fight here, I *really* don't understand what
>> you're saying here)
> 
> Jesus Christ, being a third part of the Trintity of God, commented on
> the Ten Commandments.  So contrary to Darren's suggestion, Jesus's
> statements help provide a context for forming a modern understanding of
> the Ten Commandments. That's really all I meant.

But as I wrote to Nemesis, surely God could've/would've forseen that need 
and written them clearly enough that such a clarification wouldn't be 
necessary, no?

Jim

Post a reply to this message