Warp wrote:
> Orchid XP v7 <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:
>>>   In the end you end up with:
>>>
>>> -!!#!#!###!#!###!#!###!#####!#!#####!###!#!###!#####!#####!#!#####!###
> 
>> Well, then you'd need more bits per number.
> 
>   Not really, because the end result only has '#' and '!'. You simply
> have to keep an index to the next untested value in a variable.
> 
but take care that when concatenating the strings you set all fields 
below that number to # first.

Post a reply to this message