Paul Bourke wrote:
>> why 256 in the first place?  I thought it was symbolic for 2^8.  300 is not a
>> power of 2.  The next in line would be 2^9 = 512!  holly joy! :D
> 
> Not necessarily anything magical about choosing powers of 2.
> 
what about 343 (7^3)?
>> BTW, if it's an animation precious code would be wasted trying to move the
>> camera in dramatic ways.  or will you be in charge of that?
> 
> The entry would need to do the animation using the clock variable.
> 
> -------------------------------------
> P a u l   B o u r k e
> http://local.wasp.uwa.edu.au/~pbourke/
> 
> 
> 
>

Post a reply to this message