Alain wrote:
> Invisible nous apporta ses lumieres en ce 2007/11/22 04:15:
>> I mean, let's face it, HD is only 4x the imagine resolution. If you 
>> compare the two side by side you'd probably notice. But if you just 
>> look at an HD TV, there really isn't much to notice. The picture is 
>> very slightly more crisp, but that's about it.
> Do you mean 4x the total numbet of pixels, or 4x the number of LINES?
> 4x the pixels == double the pixels per lines and double the lines.
> 4x the lines is more like 16x the resolution!

I mean 4x the number of pixels (2x lines + 2x columns).

>> Certainly it hardly seems worth paying £7,000 just for a very slightly 
>> more crisp picture. I could buy a *car* for that amount of money! 
>> Hell, I could almost buy a copy of *Oracle* for that!
> You are slightly outdated! HD prices have come down a LOT in just 2 years.

Yeah, but the shop isn't going to draw you eye to the *cheap* models, 
are they? ;-)

Post a reply to this message