On Mon, 19 Nov 2007 10:48:39 +0000, Phil Cook wrote:

> And lo on Fri, 16 Nov 2007 20:22:12 -0000, Jim Henderson
> <nos### [at] nospamcom> did spake, saying:
> 
>> On Wed, 14 Nov 2007 11:40:07 +0000, Phil Cook wrote:
>>
>>> Not that I get drunk (though looking at the date...), but that's a
>>> pretty fair description from my perspective. Just add talking a lot
>>> more then when I'm sober, something Andrew might testify as not a good
>>> thing.
>>
>> Depends on whether the "more talk" translates into "saying things I
>> shouldn't"
> 
> Fortunately mostly the same old garbage with only the odd 'you shouldn't
> have said that'.

If that's the case for you, that's a good thing.  I also tend to not say 
things that I wouldn't otherwise say....

> - something else I don't understand about some people who say
>> they didn't know what they were doing.  How can you not know what
>> you're doing?
> 
> Alcohol inhibition between short-term and long-term memories? Didn't
> they do tests on drunken goldfish?

I dunno, but then again, goldfish supposedly have short memories 
(something the Mythbusters disproved, but anyways.....)

>>>> The next morning, hungover, is not a fun feeling.  I started adding a
>>>> glass of water between beers when I was last in the UK, and that
>>>> helped a lot.  Ibuprofin helps as well.
>>>
>>> One of those odd things no hangovers <shrugs>
>>
>> Yeah, some people are fortunate that way.  I don't drink like I used to
>> any more, so I also don't have hangovers any more...
> 
> I don't tend to mix drinks, which I note others seem to do so may well
> be a factor.

I think that's a factor as well as moderation....

Jim

Post a reply to this message