|
|
Warp wrote:
> andrel <a_l### [at] hotmailcom> wrote:
>>> Btw, why is it that every time I express my opinion that we should
>>> respect other people and not make fun of them nor insult them, I get
>>> strong opposition? This is something that always keeps puzzling me.
>>>
>> My guess is that it is the way you express that opinion.
>
> And my guess that part of the problem is that people want to read
> more than there is. In this case they wanted to see me defending young
> earth creationism only because I opposed page which sole purpose seemed
> to be to mock some museum dedicated to that, even though I made quite
> clear that I opposed only the mockery, the making fun of other people,
> nothing else.
>
> In other cases, however, I just can't understand it. For example if
> I say that we should not make fun of the head of state of another country,
> people opposed me like mad. No rational explanation for that came up in
> the lengthy flamewar. I still can't understand this.
>
In most cases it is because you seem to be able to phrase your arguments
in such a way that you annoy people. You also seem totally unaware that
if you offend someone it is civil to apologize. In stead you fall back
on "I did not mean to offend, so I don't have to apologize" which
degenerates in a few posts to calling the offended stupid because he
does not understand you did not mean it, or something that amounts to
the same. You probably disagree, but IMHO your ability to understand
other peoples feeling is below average. That in itself should not have
to be a problem. If I take an on-line test to see if I am autistic I am
on the wrong side of the line too. And so will be a large proportion of
the people here. But there is no problem as long as you know it for
yourself. If you had backed off in these discussions after a few
iterations thinking "oops I did it again" *) it would have never
deteriorated into a flamewar. The sad thing of course is that many
people agree with you, but don't want to step into your flamewars for no
good reason. Hence you feel frustrated that nobody else sees the
obvious. Which enrages you even more ...
Disclaimer: this is based on a variety of observations over many years,
I won't give any specific examples because you will then show that in
your opinion I am wrong in that specific case. ;)
Ok, you talked me into it, one small recent one. At the end of a lengthy
discussion on evolution and if there are other possibilities, you came
up with nothing better than that every theory may in the end turn out to
be false. What on earth were you thinking? That we are a bunch of
uneducated stupid morons? Have you never contemplated that we all know
that and that when you start a flamewar using only that as ammunition
it'll take us a lot of iterations to understand that you really mean
just that? Not because we disagree, but because it is so basic that it
is incredible offensive to use it as a trump card. Surely Warp with his
level of intelligence knows better than that... 5 levels deeper: oops he
didn't. I still can't really believe it and the evidence suggests that
you managed to annoy even Gilles with that one.
If you feel offended by this one: I am sorry, I did not mean it that way.
*) totally aside, I have never been able to find the 'reflective spears
on a checkered plane' again. Somebody once did that, years ago. I think
it was around the time of the 'checkered spear on a reflective plane'
(the wood implement) and other silly RSOCP variants.
Post a reply to this message
|
|