Gilles Tran wrote:

> 474097aa@news.povray.org...
>> Vincent Le Chevalier <gal### [at] libertyallsurfspamfr> wrote:
>>> Well that's OK. No theory is ever correct.
>>  I just wish all those "I *know* theory X is true" people would
>> understand that.
> 
> There's the theory that Warp is a human being. It's based on several facts, 
> like the one that you're a programmer and that only human beings have been 
> found to be programmers.
> 
> Now there's the theory that Warp is a cute little bunny with a pink nose and 
> furry paws that pretends to be a human being. According to my theory, you're 
> the only rabbit who knows programming. It's based on the fact that a google 
> search on Warp+rabbit returns 600000 results. The web being the largest book 
> known to man, it must be true (Warp+aardvark returns 100000 hits, so the 
> probability of your being an aardvark is smaller).
> 
> Since you don't seem to grasp the difference between theories of the first 
> type and "theories" of the second type, I'll call you a rabbit until you can 
> disprove my theory. And if you dare tell me I'm stupid or silly, I'll be 
> deeply hurt, you wascally wabbit.
> 

Just when I was trying to make clear that I want to live in a rabbit 
free world, you come up with this :(

Post a reply to this message