andrel <a_l### [at] hotmailcom> wrote:
> >   That's curious, given that I have made absolutely no claims about the
> > evolution theory. 
> No you have, you said for instance that: 'You don't have to accept the 
> entire evolution theory as true in order to accept the similarities 
> between the hearts and take advantage of that'. Which is incompatible 
> with my definition of evolution.

  What I said does not say anything about the evolution theory.
Accepting something which can be used as evidence pro evolution is not
the same thing as accepting evolution.

> I also note that you did not answer any question on how you can apply 
> any knowledge derived from mice to humans without a common ancestor. You 
> don't have to, but I am still curious.

  You are asking me to give arguments against the evolution theory.
I won't. I have never claimed the evolution theory is false (nor that
it's true, for that matter). I don't want to get into a discussion on
whether the evolution theory is true or not. You can try to drag me on
that direction all you want, but I won't go there.

-- 
                                                          - Warp

Post a reply to this message