Warp wrote:
> Orchid XP v7 <voi### [at] devnull> wrote:
>> So yays! My program now correctly hashes the 0-byte string to yield an 
>> MD5 hash of D41D8CD98F00B204E9800998ECF8427E.
> 
>   I could do that much faster than you. Probably in something like
> 10 seconds. ;)

Well, I now have the full algorithm working. :-P

Or at least, it seems to work for messages shorter than 52 bytes anyway. 
It seems there's still a glitch in the padding algorithm that makes it 
go wrong for messages longer than 1 block...

I'm just amazed that I managed to implement an algorithm as complex and 
fiddly as MD5 in only 2 days. Heh.

Post a reply to this message