POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.general : radiosity vs. double_illuminate : Re: radiosity vs. double_illuminate Server Time
31 Jul 2024 12:16:02 EDT (-0400)
  Re: radiosity vs. double_illuminate  
From: "Jérôme M. Berger"
Date: 12 Nov 2007 13:38:29
Message: <47389da5@news.povray.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

nemesis wrote:
> =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=22J=E9r=F4me_M=2E_Berger=22?= <jeb### [at] freefr> wrote:
>>  I'd be really interested to see such a scene if you could make one,
>> but you can't (unless you use the "no_reflection" keyword of
>> course).
> 
> ...
> I can't see a thing.  Reflections or otherwise.
> 
	You've just proved my point (if you go back to what I said but you
didn't quote). If you have neither light sources nor ambient then
you don't get an image, only pure black. This has nothing to do with
reflections. The bare minimum to get an image is to have some
ambient light, and then you will get reflections too.

		Jerome
- --
+------------------------- Jerome M. BERGER ---------------------+
|    mailto:jeb### [at] freefr      | ICQ:    238062172            |
|    http://jeberger.free.fr/     | Jabber: jeb### [at] jabberfr   |
+---------------------------------+------------------------------+
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFHOJ2kd0kWM4JG3k8RAr2wAKC3UqHt8dOjab/T5mHmqpdJ4lAuWwCfYll/
XhuG2xbTs4afqKWHZMVxDiM=
=J/Mb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Post a reply to this message

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.