|
|
Invisible nous apporta ses lumieres en ce 2007/11/09 04:47:
> Darren New wrote:
>> Invisible wrote:
>>> However, it's really damn unusual for a material's electrical or
>>> magnetic properties to have any bearing at all on its optical
>>> properties.
>>
>> That's why mirrors made out of wood work so well, after all. :-)
>
> Well, you know, there are conductive materials that are reflective, and
> ones that aren't. There are insulators that are reflective, and ones
> that aren't. There seems to be little correlation here.
>
>>> * Iron is highly magnetic, while aluminium isn't. Good luck telling
>>> the two metals apart by their appearence!
>>
>> Magnetism is a field of photons at a frequency you just can't see.
>
> What an interesting concept...
>
>>> * Electricity does not, under any remotely "normal" conditions,
>>> produce light or affect it in any way. (E.g., you can't bend light
>>> using electricity.) The same goes for magnetism.
>>
>> Except for photoelectric effects, LEDs, solar cells, florescent light
>> bulbs, all that sort of thing.
>
> Solar cells work by using strange chemistry rather than directly turning
> light into electricity. (Presumably that's why they're so inefficient.)
There is NOTHING chemical about solar cells, it's all a purely physical effect.
>
> Florescent light bulbs work by stimulating atoms to release photons, not
> by directly turning electric oscilations into light.
>
> I have no clue why LEDs work. But apparently they do. ;-)
They convert electrical energy directly into light without heat.
>
>> Don't you use a computer? What do you think you're looking at?
>
> Electricity can be used to excite atoms in such a way that they release
> photons. So can heat energy, chemical energy, and all kinds of other
> energy. It's hardly unique to electricity. Basically if you get atoms
> excited enough, they glow.
>
>>> (I still can't figure out why you can use an oscilator to make radio
>>> waves, but not light rays...)
>>
>> You can. It just has to osscilate a lot faster.
>
> I think I've found an answer for this one.
>
> frequency = velocity / wavelength
>
> For light, the velocity varies a little, but it's roughly 300,000 km/s.
> That means that even if each wave is 1 km long (pretty damn long wave!),
> it's going to have a frequency of 300 kHz. If you make that wave 1 m
> long, that becomes 300 MHz, and by the time you get down to an utterly
> *microscopic* wavelength, you're well above the THz range.
>
> AFAIK, nobody has ever made an oscilator that goes that fast... (Indeed,
> maybe there's even a quantum-mechanical reason why you *can't* do this?
> Don't electrons have a "frequency" after all?)
>
> So it seems that unless you can find a material with an index of
> refraction of several thousand, you aren't going to make light with an
> electric oscilator.
--
Alain
-------------------------------------------------
Agnostic: Shit might have happened; then again, maybe not.
Post a reply to this message
|
|