|
|
Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
> I can remember a time when I was told that the big Linux vendors (RedHat,
> SuSE, maybe Canonical) used Windows-based systems for some of their
> business functions. Seems kinda odd until you remember that they do
> actually have a business to run, and sometimes that means picking
> software that you would rather not pick. I'm sure, for example, that
> Oracle will be using Windows systems internally, and it must drive
> Ellison nuts that he has to pay anything to Microsoft...
Reminds me of a reverse case: Microsoft's hotmail still runs on FreeBSD,
which is a PitA for Microsoft PR-wise. They have been trying to move the
entire hotmail system to Windows for over 4 years. Still runs on FreeBSD,
though.
Kind of "if it works, don't fix it... except if it's running on a
"competitor's" system and you have been badmouthing your competitors
for two decades".
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
|