"PhilipIsPDR" <nomail@nomail> wrote in message 
news:web.472de695cc25c29c5a2aacfe0@news.povray.org...
> "M_a_r_c" <jac### [at] wanadoofr> wrote:

>> web.472dcf35dc25d7085a2aacfe0@news.povray.org...
>> > Does anyone know a way of accomplishing this?  I've looked and looked, 
>> > and
>> > I
>> > realise I might be missing something very obvious...
>> >
>> What is obvious is that you did not make a research about the word 
>> "inside"
>> in the pov documentaion :-)
>>
>> Marc
>
>
> Thank you for your answer Marc, although it would have been nicer not to 
> have
> been put down for my lack of knowledge.  The inside function is exactly 
> what I
> was looking for; thank you for pointing me in the right direction......
>

Hi Guys,

I think Marc's smiley emoticon was a good indication that he intended to 
convey irony ie. "Ok obvious, but we all miss the obvious now and then" 
rather than as a "put-down". Remember, emoticons were invented to help avoid 
humour causing offense when you can't see the senders face or hear their 
voice. The alternative of avoiding all humour, just to be on the safe side, 
would make life a little dull (IMHO).

Regards,
Chris B.

Post a reply to this message