Darren New wrote:
> You *could* do it in C++, sure, as long as you don't make any mistakes 
> that trigger undefined behavior.

That's really more my gripe. Not that C++ is more buggy. It's that it's 
less easy to notice, track down the source of, or repair a bug. I make 
lots of buggy code as I'm developing. Making non-buggy code in a 
language with no support for knowing you made a bug takes me much much 
longer than finding the bug the first time I run the code I've written.

-- 
   Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
     Remember the good old days, when we
     used to complain about cryptography
     being export-restricted?

Post a reply to this message