Patrick Elliott wrote:
> And last time, arrays are not the 
> same things as tables. An array contains only data, a table has indexes, 
> so you can look things up by the index (and no, I don't mean a 
> *numerical* index). In a table, you can place everything for "leg" under 
> an index of "leg", not as array(1,n).

A statement by which you just disqualified yourself ... a table in a
database has nothing to do with this argument. You are using terminology
from a completely different and unrelated field. A mathematical table is the
equivalent of an array in a programming language, which does fit the context
of this "discussion".

	Thorsten

Post a reply to this message