Warp wrote:
>   Well, that would effectively be a variable, and thus it's not so much
> a stack-based language anymore.

Technically, it's still stack based, since the memory access is going 
thru the stack.

Are you saying the only operations to put data *on* the stack are DUP 
and PUSH IMMEDIATE?  Seems like it would be difficult to do much, yah.

-- 
   Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
     Remember the good old days, when we
     used to complain about cryptography
     being export-restricted?

Post a reply to this message