On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 22:01:24 +0000, Orchid XP v7 wrote:

> Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
>> Orchid XP v7 escribió:
>>> It's true though. On the surface, the regulations say that you have to
>>> actually test stuff before you go and use it, to make sure it really
>>> does work properly. Which, inconvenient though it is, seems perfectly
>>> reasonable. However, what we have hear is people make me perform a
>>> test purely for the "warm fuzzly feeling" you get from being able to
>>> say "hey, we tested something, and it worked. That's good, right?
>>> Right??"
>> 
>> Testing after any change seems like a good idea. Unless the test takes
>> more than five minutes. And you mentioned months on your blog post; so
>> they can put the test in thei-- ERROR: NNTP connection reset by peer.
> 
> Define "change".
> 
> The computers will be unplugged, moved from one building to another, and
> plugged back in.
> 
> It's not like I'm changing any settings or anything. Just the physical
> location of the boxes. It's not like software has yet reached the point
> of being aware of its surroundings.

Is the network numbering scheme the same, or does it change?  Same number 
of subnets, same routers, etc?

Server IP addresses stay the same?  You may find some "rogue" processes 
that depend on specific IP addresses that you weren't previously aware of 
if you're changing addressing schemes.

ISTR you said it's all happening at once, so maybe these things aren't 
changing.

Jim

Post a reply to this message