Warp wrote:
>   It just feels that sometimes using "less accurate" rendering methods
> which nevertheless produce a completely acceptable image is more feasible
> than using 12+ hours to render a "physically accurate" picture which to
> the layman doesn't look any different... :P

This is precisely Pixar's position on rendering.  As long as it looks 
good enough to support the story without distracting from the story, 
it's good enough.

Regards,
John

Post a reply to this message