> In article <471fc224@news.povray.org>, 
> nic### [at] gmailisthebestcom says...

>>> What exactly is the point of harping on a few sentences out of dozens of 
>>> things I have posted on this, ***after*** I already admitted, had you 
>>> bothered to read anything other than this post, that my idea was flawed, 
>>> you could still get what I was looking for in a way that isn't too 
>>> dissimilar from what Warp was suggesting instead and that the other 
>>> people had a point about storing the stuff the way I suggested being a 
>>> bad idea? Other than, that is, to be a bigger ass than I made myself 
>>> look with the comment you are quoting?
>> Sorry, I'm still catching up with posts (in chronological order, at 
>> least within threads), and I usually reply them as I read them, not 
>> after reading the whole thread. Bad habit, maybe.
>>
> That's OK. I kind of over reacted. It was like 3 days since anyone 
> bothered to post anything about it, and the first thing someone did was 
> a rant about my behavior, which I admit wasn't too congenial at that 
> point in the conversation thread. :p But, I have some times done the 
> same thing myself, when dropping in to the middle of a long series of 
> posts, so...
> 

I have once replied to year-old threads without checking the date first...

Post a reply to this message