Jim Henderson wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Oct 2007 18:20:22 -0300, Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
> 
>> Jim Henderson escribió:
>>> We can break things down by POV version, for example; that would give
>>> us distinct discussion areas for 3.6, 3.7, and 4.0.
>> If you want a discussion area, use this news server. The wiki should be
>> used to document stuff. Ideas included, but still, not a discussion in
>> terms of a "conversation". Don't let it morph into a "forum".
> 
> Actually, I agree with this idea - I phrased that badly, really - I was 
> thinking more in terms of distinct coverage of specific versions.
> 
> (All one needs to do is read my comments on the Inkscape mailing list to 
> see that I really am a proponent of "the right tool for the job", and 
> Wikis are not for discussion but for collaborative documentation).
> 

A partly agree, but there is nothing to document yet on POV4, mainly 
because it does not exist yet. A newsgroup is better to discuss things, 
but it also means that all comments are scattered around in the 
discussion tree. I'd like a place where we can collect all opinions and 
possibly the consensus reached, if any. That would mean that there will 
be several pages each discussing a specific topic that everybody can 
alter, but with the 'restriction' that nobody alters somebody else's 
comments. And where everybody preferably not even reacts to the other 
comments, but plainly states their own point of view.

Post a reply to this message