Darren New <dne### [at] sanrrcom> wrote:
> I'm merely 
> pointing out that the errors you describe comes from treating "int"s as 
> "integers". There's no such thing as an "unsigned integer", only an 
> "unsigned int".  It was a nit, nothing more. :-)

  I didn't understand that.

-- 
                                                          - Warp

Post a reply to this message