scott wrote:
>> Apparently you still don't understand what I'm trying to say...
> 
> That you'd prefer 99% of your RAM to be left unused, while sitting at 
> very basic and streamlined versions of the OS and all applications (that 
> the developers have spend years optimising RAM usage to a bare minimum 
> and so is generations behind what is normal today and 5x the price)?
> 
> Perhaps I don't understand then...

No - I'd like 99% of my RAM available for doing *useful work*, not just 
wasted because lazy programmers couldn't be bothered to fix their code.

Post a reply to this message