Patrick Elliott wrote:
> No semantic difference, just associative.

In other words, you don't like the syntax.

> And when you are dealing with 
> objects that is often more important than semantics. 

I'm not sure what's more important about a programming language than 
knowing what the constructs mean.

But given that, now we're just arguing over syntax. That makes things a 
lot more clear.

> Semantically they are **identical**, associatively they are 
> **completely** different.

On the other hand, if you could do the latter and not the former, you'd 
have a much more limited language.

-- 
   Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
     Remember the good old days, when we
     used to complain about cryptography
     being export-restricted?

Post a reply to this message