|
 |
> Gah!! This is exactly what I am talking about. And everyone else is
> instead saying, "Gosh, this is silly, why not just store every single
> transform some place else, so it takes up even more memory, then apply
> them all over again anyway, not from the history, but from a bunch of
> arrays?" Feel like I am talking to a wall here.
You are talking to a Warp.
Fabien.
Post a reply to this message
|
 |