> Fa3ien wrote:

>>
>>>   Thus all you who are worrying about the "new SDL" being some cryptic
>>> high-end programming language only a few can understand, you have got
>>> it completely wrong: Keeping the current ease-of-use and, as far as
>>> possible, the same syntax, is a *major* concern in the designing of
>>> the new SDL. You don't have to express your concern about this.
>>
>> All these threads have precisely shown that there ARE people who would
>> like POV-Ray to be driven by some high-end language (trough an API
>> or whatever).
>>
> There might be but david's wasn't one. He mere pointed out how the 
> existing SDL could be transformed *internally* to an OO type of language 
> that could be parsed and executed like one.

I was talking about Nemesis' posts, for example.

Fabien.

Post a reply to this message