David Buck wrote:
> It seems to me like the whole SDL grammar can be modelled this way which 
> would give backwards compatibility as well as expandability.
> 
> Thoughts?

Sounds like Tcl or Forth, both of which have a really tiny core that 
would be easy to rewrite if you didn't want to use the existing languages.

The phrase you're looking for is "syntax-free threaded language."

-- 
   Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
     Remember the good old days, when we
     used to complain about cryptography
     being export-restricted?

Post a reply to this message