|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Le 05.10.2007 03:09, Dre nous fit lire :
> I still believe you will get more testers if you totally remove the timeout
> (dont even get me started on the idea of a nag warning to click through!
> Bad bad bad!!!!!). Having to keep mucking around with date/time settings to
> get it to run or reverting back to 3.6 is a pita so I for one dont bother
> with any betas. If however there was no nag, or timeout, I would be more
> than happy to beta test.
It would simply be better already if the deadline was not missed
nearly everytime by the next beta.
This creates a kind of "stop & go" which is very bad for the moral
and conservation of testers.
And windows users, do not complain, you have a good priority on
getting betas... just think of amd64 linux users...
--
The superior man understands what is right;
the inferior man understands what will sell.
-- Confucius
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |