scott wrote:

> And what, you'd prefer that everyone had to pay a kind of 
> mid-range-price for the top version, when 90% of home users won't care 
> about all the features in the top version?  Or that MS develop 2 or 3 
> totally separate product lines, probably making all prices higher due to 
> far more development required?

How about they just allow unlimited CPUs on all versions? That would 
cost them nothing in development terms...

-- 
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/

Post a reply to this message