>> And what, you'd prefer that everyone had to pay a kind of mid-range-price
>> for the top version, when 90% of home users won't care about all the
>> features in the top version?  Or that MS develop 2 or 3 totally separate
>> product lines, probably making all prices higher due to far more 
>> development
>> required?
>
>  No, I would prefer they do the same thing as Apple.

And I would prefer MS made Vista free :-)

Post a reply to this message