Warp wrote:
> Chris Cason <del### [at] deletethistoopovrayorg> wrote:
>> The process we intend to follow (note this is not set in stone) is that
>> once 3.7 is stable enough for an RC, we will make a public release of the
>> 3.7 source. Some time after that (once the source is stable enough) we will
>> release a modified version of the 3.7 source labeled 4.0, with all portions
>> of the code that we cannot re-license stubbed out or otherwise removed.
> 
>   Does this mean that 4.0 will *not* have any kind of revised SDL language?

It means that it will have whatever developer resources permit it to have ;-)

	Thorsten

Post a reply to this message