Stephen wrote:

> 
> 2 min/frame! How can you complain about that, luxury :-)

Tell me about it :) though what i've found has helped me most are the 
new graphics cards inside the new box, because i spend most of my time 
working "visually", and the abysmal speed of the old PCI/AGP mix i had 
before was really cramping my style ;)

Ah well, that see-through chainmail top really did kill the speed, it 
seems - with that out of the picture, even the older box is pushing to 
1/min.

> 



Well, inside the 3D software, it doesn't matter, and while editing the 
videos, it's much easier to handle all those files and folders than on 
the XP box i use for the occasional software development and the 
"compatibility"... - eh, looks? With a computer? It's below the desk, it 
could be a brick for all i care :) but sure is much more orderly on the 
inside of the chassis than my PC.

>> file, though. Maybe i should put that online somewhere, too ;)
>>


OK, i'll drop the URL once it's finished.

>> P.S.: Aw, so far there's nothing to be seen from Rusty? :(
> 
> I thought that John said that he would enter something.

Yes, that's what i remembered, too. But i keep on hoping... still 18 
hours to go, or something. It's UK-time based, isn't it?

-M

P.S.: Arrrgh! Need another 150 frames to add a final punchline... Well, 
not "need"... "WANT!"

*sigh*

Creativity, where were you half a month ago...?

Post a reply to this message