"Warp" <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote in message 
news:46c7416d@news.povray.org...
> St. <dot### [at] dotcom> wrote:
>>     Now to the point. ;) I did a few experiments* where I used +a0.0 +am1
>> and the same but with +am3, and there was a significant difference in 
>> speed:
>
>  There's no method 3. I guess povray is reverting to method 1.

      So, method 1 is recognised by PoV-Ray but not method 3. It still 
leaves the question of what method 1 is good for compared to +a0.0?



>
>>     Second from last question, (silly question too): what does the 'am'
>> stand for?
>
>  Antialiasing method.

     Dang...   :o/



>
>>     Lastly, how can I improve these jaggies?
>
>  If rendering time is not an issue, you can increase the number of
> samples using the +r option. The default is +r3 (which means 3x3 rays).
> Try with +r4 or +r5 (and expect heavy slowdown of the rendering).

      Phew! Well, this is an image that I have to go through with. But, 
you've taught me something new there Warp. Thanks.

        I'll give that a try and hope it comes good.  ;)


             ~Steve~



>
> -- 
>                                                          - Warp

Post a reply to this message