-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

triple_r wrote:
> It's explaned in the following link somewhere in the middle, but it
> basically amounts to the vorticity minus the shear, leaving the rotation.
> Not my paper of course, but I just tried (unsuccessfully) to replicate the
> results.  I couldn't get mine even close to turbulent.
> 
> http://www.bgu.ac.il/~yakhot/homepage/publications/JFM_2006.pdf
> 
> Say, does anyone know how to get decent render times out of good-looking
> media?  Method 3 tends to give me 'slices' and Method 2 needs too many
> samples.  Here are my current settings for a smokey-looking wake, but it's
> taking quite a while.  Maybe that's to be expected.
> 
	First thing first, try:
intervals 1
samples 120

	This should be faster and give better results than your settings.
Then, try to play with the samples (only one number has meaning with
method 3), but *keep the intervals at 1*.

		Jerome
- --
+------------------------- Jerome M. BERGER ---------------------+
|    mailto:jeb### [at] freefr      | ICQ:    238062172            |
|    http://jeberger.free.fr/     | Jabber: jeb### [at] jabberfr   |
+---------------------------------+------------------------------+
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFGLPhEd0kWM4JG3k8RAoXFAJ0UlUrW5Mx3cTzqW1KxhYiGljzK1QCeIUjW
Cd0bugVY444F8rRb2phoAUI=
=1aeC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Post a reply to this message