Chambers <ben### [at] pacificwebguycom> wrote:
> Warp wrote:
> > Chambers <ben### [at] pacificwebguycom> wrote:
> >> You're dealing with two numbers, one of them being approximately 20 
> >> million times the other.  It's a known aspect of the hardware we use 
> >> that you should keep your ratios smaller than this to avoid precision 
> >> errors.
> > 
> >   Where exactly are you getting that number?

> Location of 1M, radius of 0.05.

  You didn't really answer my question.

-- 
                                                          - Warp

Post a reply to this message