|
|
Actually those aren't polygons, the snow's an isosurface using the gradient
of the rock isosurface underneath, but I calculate that gradient using just
2 samples so you get a nasty artefact. I could probably fix it with a bit of
work. Personally I think the composition in #3 is way too boring to bother
developing further.
--
Tek
http://evilsuperbrain.com
"s.day" <s.d### [at] uelacuk> wrote in message
news:web.45d6477d1312d0ce956134060@news.povray.org...
> "Tek" <tek### [at] evilsuperbraincom> wrote:
>> I've been making a few isosurface landscapes this week, so I thought I'd
>> share the best ones.
>>
>> My favourite one is the grassy cliffs, though I can't get the colours to
>> look right, it looks too fake, so I hid the ugliness with fog and gloomy
>> lighting.
>>
>> Comments would be helpful, none of these images has had more than a few
>> hours work so far and I'll probably develop one or two of them into
>> serious
>> pictures.
>>
>> Next I'm gonna try something with trees and water...
>> --
>> Tek
>> http://evilsuperbrain.com
>
> The colours of #2 are excellent, I think the snow needs some work in #3,
> not
> the layout which looks good but it looks like you can see the polygons,
> also
> the texture isn't quite right. I think if the snow can be improved #3
> could
> be my favourite..
>
> Sean
>
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|