Nicolas Calimet  wrote in message <45b3df6c@news.povray.org>:
> 	Yes, I am well aware of this problem.  When the 3.6.x series were
> released in july-august 2004, this code was not considered problematic,
> i.e. only a potential future issue that I was planning to fix in the
> upcoming 3.6.2 release.  However 3.7 came into play in between and
> we still don't have a 3.6.2.

*That* is good news. Thanks.

Post a reply to this message