|
|
I should have remembered the assumed_gamma issue before posting this... but
on the other hand, why does this only cause a problem for the PNG output but
not the BMP or TGA? And why does the render window look OK while the file
doesn't?
Personally I've never understood the need for Gamma adjustment within
POVRay... I'd second any motion for ripping it out!
Rarius
"Warp" <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote in message
news:45aab39c@news.povray.org...
> Gamma, gamma, gamma... Each time I read something about gamma, it's
> a problem with it. It seems to me that gamma only causes problems and
> doesn't actually solve any. There are tons and tons of graphical
> software out there which do just *fine* without any gamma at all to
> worry about.
>
> How about if we dropped everything related to gamma from povray?
> Who needs it anyways? It just fumbles things up and makes people
> struggle because they can't get what they want.
> What is the most common thing people use assumed_gamma for in
> povray 3.6? Trying to get rid of it! That's what.
>
> Ok, I apologize for the ranting.
>
> --
> - Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
|