Chris B wrote:
> If I understand you correctly, this would mean that the contributor would 
> need to agree to the license in perpetuity.

The expression I see used in contracts in the USA is "grants to the 
Client a non-exclusive, non-transferable, perpetual and royalty free 

whether you want it transferable, and the fact it isn't business use 
we're talking about.  Potentially adding "unlimited" or something, to 
indicate the author is giving up all the extra "rights" that europe 
gives to authors that the USA doesn't, like moral rights etc.

-- 
   Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
     Scruffitarianism - Where T-shirt, jeans,
     and a three-day beard are "Sunday Best."

Post a reply to this message