|
|
"Stephen" <mcavoys_AT_aolDOT.com> schreef in bericht
news:web.456ab90288cc0edaf1cb1e660@news.povray.org...
>
> I like the second one better. The broken ground in the first is too even
> in
> depth and does not look real (?).
Yes, also my choice. I was interested in experimenting with different
crackles and see what they would do.
> I think that you have captured the ambience of the painting but I would
> like
> to see the greebles thingy higher in the sky. I also think that Kate
> should
> have a stick in her hand to roll the hoop or "gird and cleet" as we call
> it.
In truth, I did not want to capture exactly the painting, only use it as a
basis for my own ideas. So, there is a familiarity, but both works have
further nothing to do with each other.
Personally, I prefer the greeble megastructures as they are. In my view,
they are gigantic constructions on the ground but far away.
Yes the stick could be an addition. However, It would suggest to much a
pre-planned play, while I want to suggest the girl to have come on the hoops
by chance and starting to roll them for fun.
> One other thing I noticed, I did a blink comparison of the two images and
> there is a difference in the shadow of Kate's left leg.
Correct. That is due to some different radiosity settings. In between, I had
started to change those.
Thanks for commenting!!
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|