|
|
I hope you didn't mind me using it... I've been using it to discover how the
isosurface works in use. It seemed a good file to use as a benchmark.
It does appear that V3.7 does use a different default value for
assumed_gamma which explains the lightness of the image... However the file
extension problem has been confirmed as a bug, but no-one has explained the
60% speed decrease!
BTW I use the ssc4 image as a windows wallpaper... so simple yet beautiful!
Rarius
"Tek" <tek### [at] evilsuperbraincom> wrote in message
news:455a10e7$1@news.povray.org...
> FYI, that's my source file, soon to be a povray short code contest entry
> :)
>
> It relies heavily on the default settings in povray, so if those have
> changed between versions it will look different.
>
> --
> Tek
> http://evilsuperbrain.com
>
> "Rarius" <rar### [at] rariuscouk> wrote in message
> news:455a0760@news.povray.org...
>> This is a quick post relating to my main post in povray.beta-test...
>>
>> Rendered in POVRay 3.6.1c the output file was called ssc4.bmp
>> Rendered in POVRay 3.7.0.beta16 the output file was called ssc4.tga
>>
>> The source file was posted a month or so back on povray.binaries.images..
>> I am sorry I can't remember who posted it...
>>
>> Rarius
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> I am using the free version of SPAMfighter for private users.
>> It has removed 8107 spam emails to date.
>> Paying users do not have this message in their emails.
>> Try SPAMfighter for free now!
>>
>>
>>
>
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I am using the free version of SPAMfighter for private users.
It has removed 8107 spam emails to date.
Paying users do not have this message in their emails.
Try SPAMfighter for free now!
Post a reply to this message
|
|