|
|
Just downloaded the latest 3.7 beta in preparation to my move to a new dual
core CPU later this week. I thought I'd do some comparison tests with my
old CPU before I changed over...
I have posted the source, and both result imaged to povray.binaries.images
with the same subject line...
The source file (ssc4.pov) was posted a month or so back on
povray.binaries.images.. I am sorry I can't remember who posted it...
Both renders were done using the following options...
+FS +Q9 +W640 +H480
My PC is an AMD Athlon2400+ with 1.5Gb memory.
First problem!
Version 3.7.0.beta16 was MUCH slower. Version 3.6.1c took 4m46s, while
Version3.7.0.beta16 took 7m43s... that's 60% more! Is there a better build
or should I be using some different options?
Second problem!
Version 3.7.0.beta16 rendered the image noticeably lighter. See post in
povray.binaries.images. I have converted both images to JPGs too keep the
filesize down.
Third problem!
Although the option +FS was specified, Version 3.7.0.beta16 output a
file with a TGA extension. The file is actually a BMP as I specified, but
with the wrong extension.
Rarius
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I am using the free version of SPAMfighter for private users.
It has removed 8107 spam emails to date.
Paying users do not have this message in their emails.
Try SPAMfighter for free now!
Post a reply to this message
|
|