|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
"Schwan379" <nomail@nomail> wrote in message
news:web.454bbae1bf0a728bb6c403170@news.povray.org...
>> >
>> > I renderd 300 Frames of the Scene on a Core 2 Duo E6400 @2.13 Ghz.
>> > Result: 2.25 Frames/Second.
>>
>> Good to know, my next notebook might have a C2D in it. I had looked at
>> benchmarks for those and they seem to do great for most things except
>> maybe
>> floating point. Intel never wins those FP benchmarks, you know.
>
> Its a "normal" CPU, no Notebook-CPU.
> The "normal" C2D winns those FP Benchmarks afaik - until the next
> Athlon...
Ok, that explains the "E6400". :) I had been looking at the T7200, T7400
and T7600.
There was one chart showing a C2D scoring lower on (memory?) FP than a AMD
processor, no idea where that is now. I've found out Intel might have an
improved mobile C2D in the works, basically increasing the FSB speed yet
still not equaling their desktop cousins.
This old notebook of mine is what determines when I must get a new one while
it slowly falls apart.
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |